Maybe it is because of this Philosophy class, but I find myself more than a little annoyed when someone argues in a circle. You know what I mean. For instance, I have decided that I like Ron Paul in the Republican Presidential primary. Actually, it’s a caucus here, which I have never done before so it ought to be interesting to say the least. But when I talk to some people, whom I will not name, it turns out that they can’t support him. Which is fine with me, except that the reason that they can’t support him is because he doesn’t/won’t get enough votes. When I ask, if it is possible that the reason he doesn’t get enough votes is because of this attitude, I inevitably get the brush off. It just drives me a little crazy that someone who can be otherwise very intelligent and thoughtful can be trapped within such a silly logical loop. I am one of those people who has voted for the Constitution party presidential candidate in the past because I stick with my principles before I stick with a party. My friend thinks I am stubborn for not bowing to practicality and maybe I am stubborn. But in this case I consider it a good thing. I truly believe that if I have the priviledge to vote for people who have an influence on our government then I should at least do so with a sense of obligation and conviction to principles that will not bend. In an election year where Rush Limbaugh has finally said that he might not vote for the Republican nominee for president depending on who it is, I feel vindicated that I have been on the right (pun intended) side of things for the entire time.